Hewgley v. Hewgley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hewgley v. Hewgley

353 S.W.3d 680, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1563, 2011 WL 5864314

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 2011·No. ED 95456·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronda Hewgley (Wife) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting Nelson Hew-gle/s (Husband) Motion to Modify maintenance. Wife claims that the court erred in reducing her maintenance because Husband failed to prove that a substantial and continuing change in circumstances rendered the prior award unreasonable.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronda Hewgley (Wife) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting Nelson Hew-gle/s (Husband) Motion to Modify maintenance. Wife claims that the court erred in reducing her maintenance because Husband failed to prove that a substantial and continuing change in circumstances rendered the prior award unreasonable.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hewgley v. Hewgley, 353 S.W.3d 680, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1563, 2011 WL 5864314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

353 S.W.3d 680 (Hewgley v. Hewgley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.