Hewes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hewes v. State

1981 OK CR 25, 625 P.2d 1266, 1981 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 178

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 9, 1981

DocketNo. F-79-391

StatusPublished

This text of 1981 OK CR 25 (Hewes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hewes v. State, 1981 OK CR 25, 625 P.2d 1266, 1981 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 178 (Okla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Norman Lee Hewes has appealed from his conviction of Manslaughter in the Second Degree in the District Court of Oklahoma County, in Case No. CRF-78-3180. He was originally charged with First Degree Manslaughter, but the trial court sustained his demurrer to the State’s evidence and did not instruct the jury on that charge. The sole assignment of error on appeal is that the judge, upon sustaining the demurrer, should have recommended a verdict of not guilty, instead of giving the case to the jury on the lesser included offenses.

Title 22 O.S. 1971, § 850, is not mandatory. It provides that the trial court may advise the jury to acquit a defendant, not, as the appellant claims, that the court must do so. And this Court has repeatedly held that the trial judge should instruct the jury in all the degrees of a crime which the evidence tends to prove. See, for instance, Watkins v. State, 25 Okl.Cr. 10, 218 P. 895 (1923); and Bailey v. State, 536 P.2d 985 (Okl.Cr.1975).

When the trial court found that the State had failed to present a prima facie case on the crime charged, but had presented one on the lesser included offenses, he acted properly in advising the jury that they were to consider only those lesser offenses.

The judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Norman Lee Hewes has appealed from his conviction of Manslaughter in the Second Degree in the District Court of Oklahoma County, in Case No. CRF-78-3180. He was originally charged with First Degree Manslaughter, but the trial court sustained his demurrer to the State’s evidence and did not instruct the jury on that charge. The sole assignment of error on appeal is that the judge, upon sustaining the demurrer, should have recommended a verdict of not guilty, instead of giving the case to the jury on the lesser included offenses.

Title 22 O.S. 1971, § 850, is not mandatory. It provides that the trial court may advise the jury to acquit a defendant, not, as the appellant claims, that the court must do so. And this Court has repeatedly held that the trial judge should instruct the jury in all the degrees of a crime which the evidence tends to prove. See, for instance, Watkins v. State, 25 Okl.Cr. 10, 218 P. 895 (1923); and Bailey v. State, 536 P.2d 985 (Okl.Cr.1975).

When the trial court found that the State had failed to present a prima facie case on the crime charged, but had presented one on the lesser included offenses, he acted properly in advising the jury that they were to consider only those lesser offenses.

The judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1981 OK CR 25, 625 P.2d 1266, 1981 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack