Hewes v. McNamara
106 Mass. 281
Opinion
The instructions of the court and the answers of the jury to the questions submitted to them show that the jury have found that the cow was vicious; that the defendant had notice of it; that tne defendant did not exercise due care; and that the plaintiff did. Upon this finding the defendant was liable. This renders it unnecessary to consider whether the last instruc tian was accurate. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hewes v. McNamara, 106 Mass. 281 (Mass. 1871).
106 Mass. 281 (Hewes v. McNamara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nancy Elizabeth Bowman v. Jerry Davidson and Diana Davidson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2015
Deardorff v. Burger
606 A.2d 489 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Clinkenbeard v. Reinert
225 S.W. 667 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1920)
Speckmann ex rel. Richardson v. Kreig
79 Mo. App. 376 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1899)
Linnehan v. Sampson
126 Mass. 506 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1879)