Hewell v. State

153 S.E. 93, 41 Ga. App. 372, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 600
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1930
Docket20341
StatusPublished

This text of 153 S.E. 93 (Hewell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hewell v. State, 153 S.E. 93, 41 Ga. App. 372, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 600 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court an assignment of error upon the charge of the court is not sufficient to raise any question for the consideration of the reviewing court when it fails to point out or specify the alleged error in the charge, and where the charge is not erroneous in the abstract. This ruling disposes of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur. Darsey & Darsey, for plaintiff in error. F. M. Owen, solicilor-general, B. F. McKnight, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 S.E. 93, 41 Ga. App. 372, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hewell-v-state-gactapp-1930.