Heuston v. King County

159 P. 696, 92 Wash. 701, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 782
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heuston v. King County. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 Wash. 200
Washington Supreme Court·Decided August 14, 1916·No. No. 13241·Published

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court still adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein as reported in 90 Wash. 200, 155 Pac. 773, and for the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heuston v. King County, 159 P. 696, 92 Wash. 701, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 782 (Wash. 1916).

159 P. 696 (Heuston v. King County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heuston v. King County
155 P. 773 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)