Heughes v. Roworth
232 A.D. 865
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 232 A.D. 865 (Heughes v. Roworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heughes v. Roworth, 232 A.D. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Assuming without deciding that the commissioners are hable to property owners for their tortious acts, the claim was defective in failing to state such an act and, therefore, set forth no basis for liability to the petitioners or either of them. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heughes-v-roworth-nyappdiv-1931.