Hettich v. Tunison

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hettich v. Tunison

859 S.W.2d 274, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1326, 1993 WL 317748

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 24, 1993·No. No. 62908·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals from that portion of the trial court’s order modifying the award of child support in the decree of dissolution of marriage. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals from that portion of the trial court’s order modifying the award of child support in the decree of dissolution of marriage. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Hettich v. Tunison, 859 S.W.2d 274, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1326, 1993 WL 317748 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

859 S.W.2d 274 (Hettich v. Tunison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.