Hetherington v. Rogers
26 A.3d 471
This text of 26 A.3d 471 (Hetherington v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hetherington v. Rogers, 26 A.3d 471 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of July 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Were the Petitioners, publicly elected officials, improperly removed and barred for five (5) years from office as School Board Directors from the North Schuylkill School District (“NSSD”) under Section 3-318 of the Public School Code for failure or neglect to appoint a District Superintendent for the School District where the Petitioners immediately acted to appoint, as permitted by law, an Acting District Superintendent upon the resignation of its District Superintendent, applied for a state permitted waiver to appoint the candidate of their choice under the guidance and direction of the Pennsylvania Department of Education, and the record does not and cannot support a finding of non-feasance on their part?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 A.3d 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hetherington-v-rogers-pa-2011.