Hetherington v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hetherington v. Murphy

54 A.D.2d 715, 387 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14310

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1976·Published

Opinion

a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the Police Department of the City of New York to furnish petitioner with copies of certain reports and messages, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 7, 1973, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Assuming that the judgment under review is appealable (cf. Matter of Santangello v People, 38 NY2d 536), appellant failed to show how inspection of his arrest records, etc., will assist him in the assertion of any of his rights. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the Police Department of the City of New York to furnish petitioner with copies of certain reports and messages, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 7, 1973, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Assuming that the judgment under review is appealable (cf. Matter of Santangello v People, 38 NY2d 536), appellant failed to show how inspection of his arrest records, etc., will assist him in the assertion of any of his rights. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Hetherington v. Murphy, 54 A.D.2d 715, 387 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 715 (Hetherington v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related