Hetherington v. Foster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hetherington v. Foster

1935 OK 751, 49 P.2d 760, 173 Okla. 440, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 653

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 10, 1935

DocketNo. 23531.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1935 OK 751 (Hetherington v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hetherington v. Foster, 1935 OK 751, 49 P.2d 760, 173 Okla. 440, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 653 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The statement of facts, in substance, and the questions of law involved herein are identical ’.with those in the case of Marshall Hetherington and Lula Harding v. Jacob Falk, 173 Okla. 437, 49 P. (2d) 756, this day decided by this court, and the opinion and syllabus of said case are adopted herein.

The Supreme Court acknowledges the aid of Attorneys B. A. Lewis, Glen H. Chap-pie, and J. Robt. Ray in the preparation of this opinion. These attorneys constituted an advisory committee selected by the State Bar, appointed by the Judicial Council, and approved by the Supreme Court. After the analysis of law and facts was prepared by Mr. Lewis and approved by Mr. Chappie and Mr. Ray, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon consideration, this opinion was adopted.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, Y. C. J., and BAYLESS, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The statement of facts, in substance, and the questions of law involved herein are identical ’.with those in the case of Marshall Hetherington and Lula Harding v. Jacob Falk, 173 Okla. 437, 49 P. (2d) 756, this day decided by this court, and the opinion and syllabus of said case are adopted herein.

The Supreme Court acknowledges the aid of Attorneys B. A. Lewis, Glen H. Chap-pie, and J. Robt. Ray in the preparation of this opinion. These attorneys constituted an advisory committee selected by the State Bar, appointed by the Judicial Council, and approved by the Supreme Court. After the analysis of law and facts was prepared by Mr. Lewis and approved by Mr. Chappie and Mr. Ray, the cause was assigned to a Justice of this court for examination and report to the court. Thereafter, upon consideration, this opinion was adopted.

McNEILL, C. J., OSBORN, Y. C. J., and BAYLESS, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK 751, 49 P.2d 760, 173 Okla. 440, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hetherington-v-foster-okla-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack