Hetherington v. Cusick
248 A.D. 774
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 774 (Hetherington v. Cusick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hetherington v. Cusick, 248 A.D. 774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hetherington-v-cusick-nyappdiv-1936.