Hetherington v. Coughlin

127 A.D.2d 594, 511 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43063
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 127 A.D.2d 594 (Hetherington v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hetherington v. Coughlin, 127 A.D.2d 594, 511 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the respondents to expunge from the petitioner’s prison file a notation that he is a "fugitive from the Alabama Correctional System”, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Gladwin, J.), dated November 29, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding after determining that in a prior CPLR article 78 proceeding for the same relief [595]*595Special Term (Rosenblatt, J.), by judgment dated August 2, 1984, had granted the petition only to the extent that the Department of Corrections and Board of Parole were directed "to give no more than negligible weight, if at all”, to the notation.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the judgment, dated August 2, 1984, is vacated, the petition is granted and it is directed that the notation that the petitioner is a fugitive from the Alabama Correctional System is to be expunged from his prison file.

It is uncontested that the reference to the petitioner in his prison file as a fugitive from the Alabama Correctional System is incorrect. In order to insure that this false information is not considered in future deliberations concerning the petitioner’s status, the notation should be expunged. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence, Hooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Staropoli v. Botsford
2020 NY Slip Op 2840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Udzinski v. Coughlin
188 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Deberry v. Coughlin
135 A.D.2d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Garrett v. Coughlin
128 A.D.2d 210 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.2d 594, 511 N.Y.S.2d 392, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hetherington-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1987.