Hethcote v. Hethcote

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hethcote v. Hethcote

196 S.W.3d 564, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 570, 2006 WL 1147757

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hethcote v. Hethcote. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 239 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 2006·No. No. ED 86911·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Hethcote appeals from the judgments of the circuit court sustaining the motions of Denise Hethcote to enforce the circuit court’s judgment and decree of dissolution of August 3, 2004. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Hethcote appeals from the judgments of the circuit court sustaining the motions of Denise Hethcote to enforce the circuit court’s judgment and decree of dissolution of August 3, 2004. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Hethcote v. Hethcote, 196 S.W.3d 564, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 570, 2006 WL 1147757 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

196 S.W.3d 564 (Hethcote v. Hethcote) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.