Hester v. Wezner, No. 561929 (Apr. 24, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5359
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 24, 2002
DocketNo. 561929
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5359 (Hester v. Wezner, No. 561929 (Apr. 24, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hester v. Wezner, No. 561929 (Apr. 24, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5359 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
On April 19, 2002, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court for the Judicial District of New London.

Petitioner has failed to indicate in the appropriate place on the petition form the location at which he is being confined.

Department of Correction's records filed with the court indicate that he has been confined at Cheshire Correctional Center since August 13, 2001.

Connecticut General Statutes § 52-466 requires that an application for a writ of habeas corpus be made to the superior court for the judicial district in which the petitioner claims to be illegally confined.

Since this court lacks jurisdiction, the petition is dismissed. Connecticut Practice Book § 23-29(1).

Joseph J. Purtill Judge Trial Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 52-466
Connecticut § 52-466

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-wezner-no-561929-apr-24-2002-connsuperct-2002.