Hester v. Timothy

260 A.2d 724, 106 R.I. 832, 1970 R.I. LEXIS 1003
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hester v. Timothy. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 R.I. 376
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 22, 1970·No. M. P. No. 920·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari [833]*833granted, writ to issue forthwith. Petition consolidated for hearing with Hester et al. v. Edgar J. Timothy, Clerk of the Superior Court et al., No. 919 M. P. Counsel for the parties are requested to discuss in briefs and oral arguments, in addition to other questions presented, the question of jurisdiction in particular, in light of G. L. 1956, §45-24-20, as amended.

Edward M. Botelle, Smith & Smith, Z. Hershel Smith, for petitioners. Hogan & Hogan, Edward T. Hogan, Thomas S. Hogan, for Mr. and Mrs. Sidney Tucker; William H. Leslie, Jr., Town Solicitor of Town of South Kingstown, for Royal Gould et als., respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hester v. Timothy, 260 A.2d 724, 106 R.I. 832, 1970 R.I. LEXIS 1003 (R.I. 1970).

260 A.2d 724 (Hester v. Timothy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.