Hester v. State
Opinion
Guy Hester was convicted of an assault and battery. His motion for a new trial, consisting of the general grounds and three special grounds, was overruled, and that judgment is assigned as error. The evidence (the defendant introduced none) amply authorized the finding of the jury. The three special grounds complain of three excerpts from the court’s charge. Those excerpts, when considered in the light of the entire charge, the facts of the case, and the note of the trial judge (limiting his approval of the recital of facts in the special grounds), show no cause for- a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
36 S.E.2d 128 (Hester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.