Hester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hester v. State

902 So. 2d 181, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1609, 2005 WL 357049

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 16, 2005

DocketNo. 3D04-3178

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 902 So. 2d 181 (Hester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hester v. State, 902 So. 2d 181, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1609, 2005 WL 357049 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ike Hester appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief, asserting the existence of newly discovered evidence. We have taken judicial notice of this court’s file in Hester v. State, 763 So.2d 333 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). As the trial court’s order explained, there were two separate shootings in close proximity. Assuming for purposes of discussion that the affidavit of Russell Williams could be viewed as newly discovered evidence, the affidavit does not contradict the State’s evidence and may, in fact, corroborate it.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ike Hester appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief, asserting the existence of newly discovered evidence. We have taken judicial notice of this court’s file in Hester v. State, 763 So.2d 333 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). As the trial court’s order explained, there were two separate shootings in close proximity. Assuming for purposes of discussion that the affidavit of Russell Williams could be viewed as newly discovered evidence, the affidavit does not contradict the State’s evidence and may, in fact, corroborate it.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

902 So. 2d 181, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1609, 2005 WL 357049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack