Hester v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hester v. State

357 So. 2d 481, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15727

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1113

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 357 So. 2d 481 (Hester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hester v. State, 357 So. 2d 481, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15727 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was adjudged guilty after a jury verdict of trespass. On this appeal, he claims error upon the admission of his confession without a specific finding by the court that the confession was voluntarily given. See McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973). Error is not presented for the reasons set out in Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974). See also Von Horn v. State, 334 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

A second point as to the scope of cross-examination does not present error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was adjudged guilty after a jury verdict of trespass. On this appeal, he claims error upon the admission of his confession without a specific finding by the court that the confession was voluntarily given. See McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973). Error is not presented for the reasons set out in Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974). See also Von Horn v. State, 334 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

A second point as to the scope of cross-examination does not present error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 So. 2d 481, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack