Hester v. State
357 So. 2d 481, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15727
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1978·No. No. 77-1113·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Defendant was adjudged guilty after a jury verdict of trespass. On this appeal, he claims error upon the admission of his confession without a specific finding by the court that the confession was voluntarily given. See McDole v. State, 283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973). Error is not presented for the reasons set out in Wilson v. State, 304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974). See also Von Horn v. State, 334 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
A second point as to the scope of cross-examination does not present error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hester v. State, 357 So. 2d 481, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15727 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
357 So. 2d 481 (Hester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peterson v. State
382 So. 2d 701 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Kimble v. State
372 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)