Hester v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hester v. State

73 So. 757, 15 Ala. App. 435, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 216

DecidedDecember 19, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 73 So. 757 (Hester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hester v. State, 73 So. 757, 15 Ala. App. 435, 1916 Ala. App. LEXIS 216 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

EVANS, J.

This appeal is on the record proper without a bill of exceptions. The written charges, given and refused, are set out in the transcript as provided by statute (Acts 1915, p. 815), but not the mero motu charge of the court.

*436 It has been repeatedly held that this court cannot review the charges refused to appellant in the absence of a bill of exceptions and the oral charge of the court. — Mitchell’s Case, 14 Ala. App. 104, 71 South. 982; Clay’s Case, 14 Ala. App. 664, 71 South. 982; Clark’s Case, 14 Ala. 633, 72 South. 291; Dorough’s Case, 14 Ala. App. 110, 72 South. 208.

Examination of the record shows the judgment entry and. the proceedings had in support thereof to be in all things regular, and the judgment below is accordingly, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI