Hester v. McGinnis

95 S.E. 718, 22 Ga. App. 137, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 201
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 9, 1918·No. 9089·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A written waiver of homestead and exemption is good between the parties, though not shown by an execution issued upon a .suit based on the contract wherein the waiver was made, and is provable aliunde,, whether the lien of '-’-'a judgment be general or special. Flemister v. Phillips, 65 Ga. 676; Broach v. Powell, 79 Ga. 79, 81 (3 S. E. 763). See also Davis v. Taylor, 103 Ga. 366, 375 (30 S. E. 50).

2. Upon the petition for certiorari and the answer thereto the court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 6. J., and Jenhins, J., concur. Certiorari; from Gwinnett superior court—Judge Cobb. July 5, 1917. ■ D. K. Johnston, for plaintiff in error. Ó. A. Nix, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hester v. McGinnis, 95 S.E. 718, 22 Ga. App. 137, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 201 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

95 S.E. 718 (Hester v. McGinnis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flemister v. Phillips
65 Ga. 676 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)
Broach v. Powell
3 S.E. 763 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)
Davis v. Taylor
30 S.E. 50 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)