Hester v. Horowitz

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 17, 2024
DocketCAAP-21-0000018
StatusPublished

This text of Hester v. Horowitz (Hester v. Horowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hester v. Horowitz, (hawapp 2024).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 17-JUL-2024 08:16 AM Dkt. 288 OGMD

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

JASON HESTER, an individual, Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. LEONARD G. HOROWITZ, an Individual, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant, and SHERRI KANE, an individual, Defendant- Counterclaimant-Appellee, and MEDICAL VERITAS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California nonprofit corporation; THE ROYAL BLOODLINE OF DAVID, a Washington Corporation Sole, Defendants-Appellees, and HERBERT M. RITKE; RON RITKE; THE OFFICE OF OVERSEER, A CORPORATE SOLE AND HIS SUCCESSORS, OVER/FOR THE POPULAR ASSEMBLY OF REVITALIZE, AS GOSPEL OF BELIEVERS; THE ECLECTIC CENTER OF UNIVERSAL FLOWING LIGHT-PAULO ROBERTO SILVA E SOUZA, a.k.a. AYAHUASCA CHURCH and SKY OF HAWAI#I or CEU' DO HAWAI#I; PHILLIP CAREY; FRIENDS OF THE AMAZON FOREST; HEALTH FOR WEALTH; THE HEALTH CONNECTION, INC., Counterclaim Defendants- Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10 and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 3CC141000304)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting C.J., and Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the position statement regarding status of appeal filed on June 15, 2024, by Defendant- Counterclaimant-Appellant Leonard G. Horowitz (Horowitz) and Defendant-Appellee Royal Bloodline of David (RBD), which we NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

construe as a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 42(b), and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 17, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hester v. Horowitz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-horowitz-hawapp-2024.