Hester v. . Burton

3 N.C. 136
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1801
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 136 (Hester v. . Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hester v. . Burton, 3 N.C. 136 (N.C. Ct. App. 1801).

Opinion

The execution was irregular. If there had been a cessat executis to a certain time, execution might have been taken out after that time without asci. fa., but here no certain time for the stay of execution is mentioned. The plaintiff might have taken it out the next moment after the entry. The entry makes no difference. If in the present case he can take out execution after the year, there is the same reason for his taking it out after any length of time whatever.

Execution set aside.

NOTE. — See note to Perkins v. Ballenger, 2 N.C. 367, and, in addition to the cases there referred to, see Dawson v. Shepherd,15 N.C. 497.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anonymous
2 N.C. 367 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1796)
Dawson v. . Shepherd
15 N.C. 497 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-burton-ncsuperct-1801.