Hester v. Bull

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hester v. Bull

236 A.D. 638, 260 N.Y.S. 815, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 236 A.D. 638 (Hester v. Bull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hester v. Bull, 236 A.D. 638, 260 N.Y.S. 815, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in Martin v. Bull (236 App. Div. 637), decided herewith, the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in Martin v. Bull (236 App. Div. 637), decided herewith, the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D. 638, 260 N.Y.S. 815, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-bull-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack