Hester v. Bull

236 A.D. 638, 260 N.Y.S. 815, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons given in Martin v. Bull (236 App. Div. 637), decided herewith, the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to consolidate granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hester v. Bull, 236 A.D. 638, 260 N.Y.S. 815, 1932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

236 A.D. 638 (Hester v. Bull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Bull
236 A.D. 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)