Hester v. Beckley Register Herald

Fourth Circuit

Hester v. Beckley Register Herald

353 F. App'x 883

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2009·No. No. 09-7366·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Cutha Hester, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hester v. Beckley Register Herald, No. 5:07-cv-00891, 2009 WL 2032033 (S.D.W.Va. July 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warren Cutha Hester, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hester v. Beckley Register Herald, No. 5:07-cv-00891, 2009 WL 2032033 (S.D.W.Va. July 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hester v. Beckley Register Herald, 353 F. App'x 883 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

353 F. App'x 883 (Hester v. Beckley Register Herald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related