Hesslink v. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hesslink v. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc.

106 A.D.2d 877, 483 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21783

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1984·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm the order dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327 (inconvenient forum) for reasons stated at Special Term, Kane, J. In view of this determination, the appeals of certain of the defendants from denials of their motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or because of the pendency of an action in Virginia are moot, and we do not reach the issues raised therein. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm the order dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327 (inconvenient forum) for reasons stated at Special Term, Kane, J. In view of this determination, the appeals of certain of the defendants from denials of their motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or because of the pendency of an action in Virginia are moot, and we do not reach the issues raised therein. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.

Hesslink v. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc., 106 A.D.2d 877, 483 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

106 A.D.2d 877 (Hesslink v. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.