Hesslink v. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc.
This text of 106 A.D.2d 877 (Hesslink v. Doubleday, Doran & Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We affirm the order dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 327 (inconvenient forum) for reasons stated at Special Term, Kane, J. In view of this determination, the appeals of certain of the defendants from denials of their motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or because of the pendency of an action in Virginia are moot, and we do not reach the issues raised therein. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kane, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Green and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 A.D.2d 877, 483 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hesslink-v-doubleday-doran-company-inc-nyappdiv-1984.