Hessler v. T & N, PLC
642 So. 2d 851, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9498, 1994 WL 535086
Opinion
The appellant has failed to demonstrate error or abuse of discretion in (a) the trial court’s exclusion of proposed rebuttal testimony, see Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 528 So.2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959), or (b) any ruling as to the elements of the plaintiff’s strict liability claim. See Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir.1985).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hessler v. T & N, PLC, 642 So. 2d 851, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9498, 1994 WL 535086 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
642 So. 2d 851 (Hessler v. T & N, PLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Driscoll v. Morris
114 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Rhodes v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.
528 So. 2d 459 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
761 F.2d 1129 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)