Hessen v. Hessen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hessen v. Hessen

41 A.D.2d 849, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4698

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 849 (Hessen v. Hessen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hessen v. Hessen, 41 A.D.2d 849, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant-respondent to amend decision [40 A D 2d 842] and order of this court both dated November 13, 1972 so as to direct that the alimony in the increased amount ($400 per week) be paid as of June 1, 1972, the date fixed in the judgment for the commencement of the alimony payments. Motion denied as unnecessary. The modification by this court of the amount required to be paid by the judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 28, 1972, means that the increased amount must be paid from the date specified in said judgment, the theory being that this court did what the Special Term should have done. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant-respondent to amend decision [40 A D 2d 842] and order of this court both dated November 13, 1972 so as to direct that the alimony in the increased amount ($400 per week) be paid as of June 1, 1972, the date fixed in the judgment for the commencement of the alimony payments. Motion denied as unnecessary. The modification by this court of the amount required to be paid by the judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 28, 1972, means that the increased amount must be paid from the date specified in said judgment, the theory being that this court did what the Special Term should have done. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 849, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hessen-v-hessen-nyappdiv-1973.