Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hessel v. State

Hessel v. State

525 So. 2d 512, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1299, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2204, 1988 WL 53023
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 1988
DocketNo. 87-3287
StatusPublished

This text of 525 So. 2d 512 (Hessel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hessel v. State, 525 So. 2d 512, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1299, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2204, 1988 WL 53023 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant certiorari and quash the order affirming petitioner’s traffic conviction of a violation of section 316.183(5), Florida Statutes (1985), because we find the evidence legally insufficient to sustain the conviction. Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981). The cause is remanded to the circuit court for entry of an order reversing the judgment and remanding to the trial court for the entry of a judgment of acquittal.

Certiorari granted; order quashed with directions.

WALDEN and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 So. 2d 512, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1299, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2204, 1988 WL 53023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hessel-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.