Hess v. Kemmerer
65 Pa. Super. 247, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 55
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 18, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 195·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Opinion by
The painstaking analysis of the testimony by the trial judge, and his application of decided cases to the undisputed facts in overruling the defendant’s motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto, make it unnecessary to further review this case, and for the reasons given in his opinion, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hess v. Kemmerer, 65 Pa. Super. 247, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 55 (Pa. Ct. App. 1916).
65 Pa. Super. 247 (Hess v. Kemmerer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Curt v. Ziman
12 A.2d 802 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Rose v. Quaker City Cab Co.
69 Pa. Super. 208 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)