Hess v. International Railway Co.

167 A.D. 959, 152 N.Y.S. 1117

This text of 167 A.D. 959 (Hess v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hess v. International Railway Co., 167 A.D. 959, 152 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Merrell, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff failed to establish by a preponderance of evidence that she would have slipped had there been no water on the steps, as required by the charge of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D. 959, 152 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hess-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1915.