Hess v. International Railway Co.
167 A.D. 959, 152 N.Y.S. 1117
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Merrell, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff failed to establish by a preponderance of evidence that she would have slipped had there been no water on the steps, as required by the charge of the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hess v. International Railway Co., 167 A.D. 959, 152 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
167 A.D. 959 (Hess v. International Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.