Hess v. Hess

488 So. 2d 870, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1125, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7800
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hess v. Hess. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 874
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1986·No. No. 85-2809·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appealed order of the trial court, insofar as it directs that the parties “shall be governed by shared parental responsibility pursuant to § 61.13, [Fla.Stat. (1985) ]” relative to custody of the two minor children born of the marriage, is reversed and remanded upon the authority of Iljazi v. Iljazi, 436 So.2d 326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), and Ballah v. Poole, 453 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Upon remand, the trial court is directed to reconsider whether the evidence shows a material change in circumstances which, in the best interests of the children, requires a change in custody.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hess v. Hess, 488 So. 2d 870, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1125, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

488 So. 2d 870 (Hess v. Hess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iljazi v. Iljazi
436 So. 2d 326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Ballah v. Poole
453 So. 2d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)