Hess v. Edelman
This text of 31 A.D.2d 969 (Hess v. Edelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 9, 1968, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. As we read the oral opinion of the Trial Judge in the prior action between these parties (Edelman v. Hess), he found that Kuny Edelman was negligent and that Catherine Hess was not. Under the circumstances, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted under the doctrine of res judicata. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ. concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A.D.2d 969, 300 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hess-v-edelman-nyappdiv-1969.