Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hess v. Di Pronio

Hess v. Di Pronio

96 A.D.2d 1134, 467 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19804
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 1, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1134 (Hess v. Di Pronio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hess v. Di Pronio, 96 A.D.2d 1134, 467 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition granted. Memorandum. Section 6-130 of the Election Law requires each signer of a designating petition to provide his “residence address.” A post-office box number is not a residence address as required by the statute. The signatures on lines 1, 9 and 10 of the designating petition are accompanied only by post-office box numbers and are, therefore, invalid. Since the designating petition does not contain the required number of valid signatures, it must be invalidated. (Appeal from order of Seneca Supreme Court, Henry, J. — Election Law.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fibernet Telecom Group, Inc. v. East Coast Optical Services
195 Misc. 2d 461 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Liepshutz v. Palmateer
112 A.D.2d 1101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.2d 1134, 467 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hess-v-di-pronio-nyappdiv-1983.