Hess v. Commonwealth

921 A.2d 1181, 591 Pa. 653, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 994
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 1, 2007·No. 350 MAL 2003·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED limited to the issue of whether petitioner possessed independent authority to impose the interlock requirement. The Order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED pursuant to McGrory v. PennDOT, 591 Pa. 56, 915 A.2d 1155 (2007). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hess v. Commonwealth, 921 A.2d 1181, 591 Pa. 653, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 994 (Pa. 2007).

921 A.2d 1181 (Hess v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGrory v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
915 A.2d 1155 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)