Hess v. Beard
This text of 93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478 (Hess v. Beard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court finds that the jurisdiction of this court rn this proceeding in error was based on the allegation in the petition in error that it involves questions arising under the constitution of the United States and of the state of Ohio, and the court finds that the record does not disclose that the disposition of the case requires the consideration of any constitutional question, or that such question is involved.
It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Dismissed for zuant of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hess-v-beard-ohio-1915.