Hess v. Beard

Ohio Supreme Court

Hess v. Beard

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 9, 1915·No. No. 14806·Published

Opinion

The court finds that the jurisdiction of this court rn this proceeding in error was based on the allegation in the petition in error that it involves questions arising under the constitution of the United States and of the state of Ohio, and the court finds that the record does not disclose that the disposition of the case requires the consideration of any constitutional question, or that such question is involved.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Dismissed for zuant of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court finds that the jurisdiction of this court rn this proceeding in error was based on the allegation in the petition in error that it involves questions arising under the constitution of the United States and of the state of Ohio, and the court finds that the record does not disclose that the disposition of the case requires the consideration of any constitutional question, or that such question is involved.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Dismissed for zuant of jurisdiction.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Hess v. Beard, 93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478 (Ohio 1915).

Pincite

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478 (Hess v. Beard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.