Hess, M. v. PUC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 8, 2015·No. 62 MAL 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

MARVIN ROGER HESS AND LEONA : No. 62 MAL 2015 HESS, RONALD AND DIANNE MACE, : ROY AND CINDY MAURER, THE : SHOOP FAMILY TRUST C/O EDWIN : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the AND DENNY SHOOP, AND GARY AND : Order of the Commonwealth Court DORENE LAHR :

:

v.

:

PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY : COMMISSION :

: :

PPL ELECTRIC UNILITIES : AND PPL SERVICES : CORPORATION, :

:

Intervenors :

: : : :

PETITION OF: MARVIN ROGER HESS : AND LEONA HESS AND ROY AND : CINDY MAURER :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hess, M. v. PUC, (Pa. 2015).

Hess, M. v. PUC (Hess, M. v. PUC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.