Hess, Inc., Libellant-Appellant v. The Arizona, Perseveranza Societa Di Navigazione, , (Together With Consolidated Cross-Libel)

242 F.2d 706
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 1957
Docket24341_1
StatusPublished

This text of 242 F.2d 706 (Hess, Inc., Libellant-Appellant v. The Arizona, Perseveranza Societa Di Navigazione, , (Together With Consolidated Cross-Libel)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hess, Inc., Libellant-Appellant v. The Arizona, Perseveranza Societa Di Navigazione, , (Together With Consolidated Cross-Libel), 242 F.2d 706 (2d Cir. 1957).

Opinion

242 F.2d 706

HESS, Inc., Libellant-Appellant,
v.
THE ARIZONA, Perseveranza Societa di Navigazione, claimant,
et al., Respondents-Appellees (together with
consolidated cross-libel).

No. 187, Docket 24341.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 4, 5, 1957.
Decided Feb. 25, 1957.

Leonard J. Matteson, of Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City (Charles A. Van Hagen, Jr., of Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, and Donald M. Waesche, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for libellant-appellant, Hess, Inc.

George B. Warburton, of Hill, Rivkins, Middleton, Louis & Warburton, New York City (Herbert P Reid, New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee Perseveranza Societa di Navigazione, owner of the Tanker Arizona.

Adrian J. O'Kane, of Burlingham, Hupper & Kennedy, New York City (H. Barton Williams, New York City, on the brief), for respondents-appellees Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., and Tugs Carol Moran and Sheila Moran.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, MEDINA, Circuit Judge, and SMITH, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the reasoned findings of fact, conclusions of law, and opinion of Chief Judge Clancy, 149 F.Supp. 733, finding the pier-owner, Hess, Inc., solely responsible for the collision of a tanker with its pier because of its distribution of misleading charts, which failed to disclose shallow water near the pier and thus led to the grounding of the tanker on a shoal and resulting swing into the pier.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hess, Inc. v. The Arizona
149 F. Supp. 733 (S.D. New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 F.2d 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hess-inc-libellant-appellant-v-the-arizona-perseveranza-societa-di-ca2-1957.