Hess Corp. v. Genesis Realty Group LLC

122 A.D.3d 511, 995 N.Y.S.2d 508
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 2014·No. 13545 153188/12·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered March 25, 2014, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against defendants-respondents, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Since there is no underlying or master agreement for the purchase of fuel oil from plaintiff by defendants-respondents, “each shipment represents a separate agreement to purchase [fuel oil]” (Sharp Elecs. Corp. v Arkin-Medo, Inc., 86 AD2d 817 [1st Dept 1982], affd 58 NY2d 986 [1983]). Thus, Uniform Commercial Code § 2-717 is inapplicable, and defendants-respondents are not entitled to withhold payment for fuel oil deliveries in 2010 to offset payments made for earlier fuel oil deliveries on which they believe they may have been shorted.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Friedman, Andrias, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hess Corp. v. Genesis Realty Group LLC, 122 A.D.3d 511, 995 N.Y.S.2d 508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

122 A.D.3d 511 (Hess Corp. v. Genesis Realty Group LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharp Electronics Corp. v. Arkin-Medo, Inc.
58 N.Y.2d 986 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)