Heslin v. Whalen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heslin v. Whalen

215 A.D. 713

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The following is the opinion of the court below:

Van Siclen, J.:

The subject of the proposed examination seems to be as fully stated as necessary and to be the proper subject of examination. The fact that the items are in part stated as in the complaint is not a defect, especially in view of the fact that the allegations of the complaint are unusually full and detailed. The motion for the examination will be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following is the opinion of the court below:

Van Siclen, J.:

The subject of the proposed examination seems to be as fully stated as necessary and to be the proper subject of examination. The fact that the items are in part stated as in the complaint is not a defect, especially in view of the fact that the allegations of the complaint are unusually full and detailed. The motion for the examination will be granted.

Heslin v. Whalen, 215 A.D. 713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

215 A.D. 713 (Heslin v. Whalen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related