Heslan v. Bergeron

47 A. 896, 94 Me. 395, 1900 Me. LEXIS 72
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 3, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 47 A. 896 (Heslan v. Bergeron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heslan v. Bergeron, 47 A. 896, 94 Me. 395, 1900 Me. LEXIS 72 (Me. 1900).

Opinion

Strout, J.

The notes in suit were payable at the First National Bank, in Lewiston. They were not presented at that bank before suit brought. It was not necessary to do so. If the maker was ready to pay them on presentation at the bank, that could be shown in defense. Stowe, v Colburn, 30 Maine, 32.

This action is by the indorsee against the maker. The ruling that the maker of the notes was an incompetent witness to pi-ove their illegal inception, until notice of such illegality was brought home to the plaintiff, was correct. Baxter v. Ellis, 57 Maine, 178. The rule is different when the action is between the original parties to the note. Smith v. McGlinchy, 77 Maine, 153.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A. 896, 94 Me. 395, 1900 Me. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heslan-v-bergeron-me-1900.