Hesdorffer v. Pearl River Valley Water Supply District
This text of 572 So. 2d 1209 (Hesdorffer v. Pearl River Valley Water Supply District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
for the Court:
Dr. Eugene Hesdorffer has appealed a judgment of the Madison County Chancery Court dismissing his complaint to cancel as a cloud on his property a deed to the defendant Pearl River Valley Water Supply District. The district moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure because Hesdorf-fer had not deraigned title as required by Miss.Code Ann. § 11-17-35 (1972).
This case is controlled by Carpenter v. Haggard, 538 So.2d 776 (Miss.1989). The Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, 81(h), Appendix B, supplanted Miss.Code Ann. § 11-17-35. Rule 81(h) was not disapproved by S.Con.Res. 617, 1982 Miss.Laws 675; also see, Miss.Code Ann. § 9-3-71.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
572 So. 2d 1209, 1990 Miss. LEXIS 801, 1990 WL 257418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hesdorffer-v-pearl-river-valley-water-supply-district-miss-1990.