Herzogg v. Chambers

61 Ind. 333
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 61 Ind. 333 (Herzogg v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herzogg v. Chambers, 61 Ind. 333 (Ind. 1878).

Opinion

Niblack, C. J.

This was an action by Albert B. Chambers against Frederick S. Herzogg and Henry Heithecker. *

The complaint alleged, that the plaintiff and defendants had previously thereto executed a joint promissory note, the said Herzogg as principal and the said Chambers and Heithecker as sureties, which note he, the plaintiff’, had been compelled to pay, and had paid, in full; that, for a valuable consideration, moving from the said Herzogg, Heithecker had agreed to pay said note for Herzogg.

Heithecker made default, and, Herzogg’s defences to the action not being sustained, a joint judgment was rendered against both, from which Herzogg alone has appealed, making Heithecker an appellee with Chambers, and assigning errors against him, jointly with Chambers, without serving notice of the appeal on him, upon the alleged theory that his interests in the cause are adverse to Herzogg’s.

[334]*334Chambers has moved to dismiss the appeal for want of notice of such appeal to Heithecker as above stated.

We see nothing in this case which takes it out of the general rule laid down in section 551 of the code, requiring notice to co-parties who decline to join in an appeal.

Heithecker was a co-party with Herzogg, within the meaning of that section, and notice to him was necessary to complete the appeal. Making him a proforma appellee did not dispense with notice to him of the appeal, as required by said section 551. Reeder v. Maranda, 55 Ind. 239 ; Rabb v. Graham, 43 Ind. 1; Koerner v. Baldwin, 39 Ind. 474.

The appeal must therefore be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buchanan v. Morris
151 N.E. 385 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1926)
Gregory v. Smith
38 N.E. 395 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Cooper v. Peterson
34 N.E. 746 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.
28 N.E. 549 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Koons v. Mellett
7 L.R.A. 231 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
State ex rel. Young v. Cunningham
101 Ind. 461 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Field v. Burton
71 Ind. 380 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Pierson v. Hart
64 Ind. 254 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Ind. 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herzogg-v-chambers-ind-1878.