Herzog v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Herzog v. State

475 So. 2d 747, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15993

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 25, 1985

DocketNo. 85-672

StatusPublished

This text of 475 So. 2d 747 (Herzog v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herzog v. State, 475 So. 2d 747, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15993 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court’s order denying appellant's motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We reverse only that portion of the order denying appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We remand with directions that the trial court either schedule an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record which conclusively establish that appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court’s order denying appellant's motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We reverse only that portion of the order denying appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We remand with directions that the trial court either schedule an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record which conclusively establish that appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 So. 2d 747, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2205, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herzog-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.