Herzog v. Shapiro

30 Misc. 782, 62 N.Y.S. 780
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 782 (Herzog v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herzog v. Shapiro, 30 Misc. 782, 62 N.Y.S. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

O’Gorman, J.

The defense of the nonjoinder of Betsy Shapiro, a necessary party defendant, is clearly established by the proofs. Apart from this point, however, the evidence amply supports the conclusion reached by the court below on the facts, and the judgment appealed from should not be disturbed.

Beekman, P. J., and Giegerich, J., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 782, 62 N.Y.S. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herzog-v-shapiro-nyappterm-1900.