Herzman Scarfs, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Herzman Scarfs, Inc. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 201, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4097

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 6, 1963

DocketNo. 67415; protests 290289-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cust. Ct. 201 (Herzman Scarfs, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herzman Scarfs, Inc. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 201, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4097 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of nylon woven mufflers, hemmed, similar in use to silk woven mufflers, hemmed, valued at more than $5 per dozen, the claim at 27% percent ad valorem under paragraph 1209, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of nylon -wearing apparel similar in use to silk wearing apparel, were held dutiable at 32% percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), as claimed. United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of nylon woven mufflers, hemmed, similar in use to silk woven mufflers, hemmed, valued at more than $5 per dozen, the claim at 27% percent ad valorem under paragraph 1209, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of nylon -wearing apparel similar in use to silk wearing apparel, were held dutiable at 32% percent under paragraph 1210, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), as claimed. United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cust. Ct. 201, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herzman-scarfs-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1963.