HERZ v. YOUNG

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana
DecidedJuly 29, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-01877
StatusUnknown

This text of HERZ v. YOUNG (HERZ v. YOUNG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HERZ v. YOUNG, (S.D. Ind. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

CAROLYN WENDY HERZ, ) ) No. 1:20-cv-01877-JPH-DLP Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) RICHARD L. YOUNG, ) INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL ) SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ) ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE ) OF INDIANA, ) EVAN GOODMAN, ) FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS ) COMMISSION, ) ERIC HOLCOMB, ) DENNIS SASSO, ) SANDY SASSO, ) LESLIE PAGE, ) ASCENSION HEALTH, INC. ) JACQUELINE HOBBS, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND STAY PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Carolyn Wendy Herz (“Plaintiff”) originally filed this action in Marion Superior Court on June 25, 2020 under Cause No. 49D06-2006-CT- 021101. On July 15, 2020, her case was removed to federal court. See dkt. 1, (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a) (civil actions brought against the United States, its officers, or agencies may be removed to the United States District Court)). The Court takes notice that Ms. Herz is also known as Carolyn H. Srivastava, whose right to file within this Circuit and this Court is restricted. Ms. Herz is subject to sanctions that were imposed by the Seventh Circuit in an Order dated August 30, 2011. The Order specifies: [T]he clerks of all federal courts in this circuit shall return unfiled any papers submitted either directly or indirectly by or on behalf of Carolyn H. Srivastava unless and until she pays in full the sanction that has been imposed against her. See In re: City of Chi., 500 F.3d 582, 585-86 (7th Cir. 2007); Support Sys. Int’l, Inc. v. Mack, 45 F.3d 185, 186 (7th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). In accordance with our decision in Mack, exceptions to this filing bar are made for criminal cases and for applications for writs of habeas corpus. See Mack, 45 F.3d at 186-87. This order will be lifted immediately once Srivastava makes full payment. See City of Chi., 500 F.3d at 585-86.

Srivastava v. Zoeller, No. 11-2817 (7th Cir. Aug. 30, 2011) (imposing filing restrictions on Ms. Herz pending payment of $1500 fine). This Court has also sanctioned Ms. Herz, preventing her from filing. An amended injunction was issued in Cause No. 1:04-mc-104-SEB-DML on July 29, 2011, and was extended as recently as May 22, 2014. See In re: Srivastava, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84121 (S.D. Ind. July 29, 2011); In re: Carolyn Wendy Herz f/k/a Carolyn Srivastava, 1:04-mc-104 (S.D. Ind. May 22, 2014) (enjoining Ms. Herz from filing or continuing to litigate any claim in any court of any jurisdiction that targets the defendants in any of her prior cases or claims until eight months beyond certain reports are filed with the court). The Court does not believe that Ms. Herz has satisfied her obligations under either of these orders. Until Ms. Herz has satisfied her obligations both before the Seventh Circuit and before this Court, it is not possible for her to litigate her claims. IT IS ORDERED that Ms. Herz has through August 13, 2020 to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed because restrictions have been imposed on her ability to file papers in federal courts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, other than a response to this show cause order, Ms. Herz is prohibited from delivering any documents to the Clerk for filing, and must not attempt to present materials or information to the Court in an indirect fashion, such as by sending a fax or an email to the Court or its personnel except as explicitly provide by General Orders of this Court. To do so would be a violation of the orders of the Court of Appeals and of this Court. Any and all proceedings in this matter are STAYED until the Court acts, either upon Ms. Herz' response to this order, or upon Ms. Herz’ failure to respond if no response is made. SO ORDERED. Date: 7/29/2020 S\amnu Patruck anor James Patrick Hanlon United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana

Distribution by U.S. Mail to: Carolyn Wendy Herz 3105 Lehigh Court Indianapolis, IN 46268-1320 Distribution to electronically registered counsel via ECF

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Support Systems International, Inc. v. Richard Mack
45 F.3d 185 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
In Re City of Chicago
500 F.3d 582 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
HERZ v. YOUNG, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herz-v-young-insd-2020.