Herz v. Pennsylvania R. R.
153 A. 686, 302 Pa. 324, 1931 Pa. LEXIS 660
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 3, 1930·No. Appeals, 323 and 324·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The order of the court below discharging plaintiffs’ rule for leave to amend the statement of claim in this action is clearly correct, and the judgment entered thereon is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herz v. Pennsylvania R. R., 153 A. 686, 302 Pa. 324, 1931 Pa. LEXIS 660 (Pa. 1930).
153 A. 686 (Herz v. Pennsylvania R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamsher, D. v. Shook, N.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2019
Clark v. Multi-Family Management, Inc.
14 Va. Cir. 1 (Winchester County Circuit Court, 1987)
Herron v. Silbaugh
260 A.2d 755 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Severance v. Heyl & Patterson
174 A. 787 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Jennings
64 F.2d 531 (Third Circuit, 1933)