Hervy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hervy v. State

946 So. 2d 1128, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21130, 2006 WL 3687105

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 2006

DocketNo. 2D05-4165

StatusPublished

This text of 946 So. 2d 1128 (Hervy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hervy v. State, 946 So. 2d 1128, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21130, 2006 WL 3687105 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Potts v. State, 718 So.2d 757, 759 (Fla.1998) (“Because the court’s ruling [regarding the defendant’s waiver of counsel] turns primarily on an assessment of demeanor and credibility, its decision is entitled to great weight and will be affirmed on review if supported by competent substantial evidence in the record.”); Guilder v. State, 899 So.2d 412, 420 (Fla. [1129]*11294th DCA 2005) (holding that “trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to conduct a proper” inquiry pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), where record indicated defendant made, the choice to proceed pro se with a full understanding of his decision).

CANADY, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Potts v. State, 718 So.2d 757, 759 (Fla.1998) (“Because the court’s ruling [regarding the defendant’s waiver of counsel] turns primarily on an assessment of demeanor and credibility, its decision is entitled to great weight and will be affirmed on review if supported by competent substantial evidence in the record.”); Guilder v. State, 899 So.2d 412, 420 (Fla. [1129]*11294th DCA 2005) (holding that “trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to conduct a proper” inquiry pursuant to Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), where record indicated defendant made, the choice to proceed pro se with a full understanding of his decision).

CANADY, WALLACE, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

946 So. 2d 1128, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21130, 2006 WL 3687105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hervy-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack