Hertzog v. California Plant Protection/Pinkerton's, Inc.
This text of 549 So. 2d 1098 (Hertzog v. California Plant Protection/Pinkerton's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Herman Hertzog, claimant, appeals a workers’ compensation order dismissing his claim for disability, medical, and related benefits on the ground that the injuries he sustained did not arise out of his employment. We find that the deputy correctly dismissed all claims except claimant’s claim for past medical expenses. Claimant alleged that the employer expressly authorized these expenses, and appellees concede on appeal that the parties stipulated that this issue would be reserved for decision pending the outcome of the merits hearing. We reverse the order to the extent that it fails to reserve jurisdiction to determine the issue of liability for past medical expenses. In all other respects the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 So. 2d 1098, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2275, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5371, 1989 WL 113238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertzog-v-california-plant-protectionpinkertons-inc-fladistctapp-1989.