Hertzog v. California Plant Protection/Pinkerton's, Inc.

549 So. 2d 1098, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2275, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5371, 1989 WL 113238
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 1989·No. No. 89-288·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ZEHMER, Judge.

Herman Hertzog, claimant, appeals a workers’ compensation order dismissing his claim for disability, medical, and related benefits on the ground that the injuries he sustained did not arise out of his employment. We find that the deputy correctly dismissed all claims except claimant’s claim for past medical expenses. Claimant alleged that the employer expressly authorized these expenses, and appellees concede on appeal that the parties stipulated that this issue would be reserved for decision pending the outcome of the merits hearing. We reverse the order to the extent that it fails to reserve jurisdiction to determine the issue of liability for past medical expenses. In all other respects the order is affirmed.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hertzog v. California Plant Protection/Pinkerton's, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1098, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2275, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5371, 1989 WL 113238 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

549 So. 2d 1098 (Hertzog v. California Plant Protection/Pinkerton's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Trump
549 So. 2d 1098 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)