Hertzmark v. Conway
136 A. 926, 5 N.J. Misc. 302, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 271
This text of 136 A. 926 (Hertzmark v. Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hertzmark v. Conway, 136 A. 926, 5 N.J. Misc. 302, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 271 (N.J. 1927).
Opinion
Upon consideration of the affidavits and argument of counsel, we come to the conclusion that the application is without substantial merit.
A writ of certiorari is therefore refused. If a rule to show cause was made herein, the same will be discharged.
Defendants are entitled to costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
136 A. 926, 5 N.J. Misc. 302, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hertzmark-v-conway-nj-1927.